Određivanje sadržaja silicijum-dioksida u boksitu: poređenje metode ICP-OES sa metodom UV-VIS

Glavni sadržaj članka

Gordana Ostojic
Dragica Lazić
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5251-6701
Saša Zeljković
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7864-9553

Apstrakt

U ovom radu metoda optičke emisione spektrometrije sa induktivno spregnutom plazmom (engl. inductively coupled plasma - optical emission spectrometry, ICP-OES) korištena je za određivanje sadržaja silicijum-dioksida u boksitu, kao važne primese koja utiče na kvalitet i primenu boksita u proizvodnji glinice po Bajerovom (Bayer) postupku. Analizirano je dvadeset uzoraka boksita iz sedam različitih ležišta. Rezultati su upoređivani sa referentnom metodom UV-vidljive spektroskopije. Srednja relativna razlika između sadržaja silicijum-dioksida određenog pomoću ICP-OES metode i referentne metode je 4.88 %. Za procenu usporedivosti metoda korišteni su statistički testovi, zatim grafikon raspršenosti (engl. scatter plot), te Bland - Altman, „Passing-Bablok“ i "Mountain" grafikoni. Grafičke komparacije uglavnom ne pokazuju statistički značajne razlike između metoda. Tačnost i preciznost ICP-OES metode proverena je pomoću standardnog referentnog materijala SRM NIST 697, boksit Dominikan. Vrednosti iskorištenja (engl. recovery) i ponovljivost, izražena kao relativna standardna devijacija (RSD), su u okviru kriterijuma prihvatljivosti. Na snovu t-testa postoji statistički značajna razlika između srednje vrednosti ICP-OES merenja i sertifikovane vrednosti sadržaja silicijum-dioksida, što se može pripisati efektu sistematske greške ICP-OES analize.

Detalji članka

Broj časopisa

Rubrika

Primenjena hemija

Kako citirati

[1]
G. Ostojic, D. . Lazić, and S. Zeljković, “Određivanje sadržaja silicijum-dioksida u boksitu: poređenje metode ICP-OES sa metodom UV-VIS”, Hem Ind, vol. 76, no. 2, pp. 109–124, May 2022, doi: 10.2298/HEMIND211223007O.

Reference

McGuiness L, Nunes MD, Kroes F, Chai I. Automated analysis of bauxite exploration drill hole samples by diffuse reflectance Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy. In: Proceedings of the 7th International Alumina Quality Workshop. Australia, 2005; 187–192.

Authier-Martin M, Forte G, Ostap S, See J. The mineralogy of bauxite for producing smelter-grade alumina. JOM 2001; 53(12) :36–40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-001-0011-1

Nechitailov A P, Suss AG, Zhilina TI, Belanova E A. New method of analyzing bauxites to determine their main components and impurities. Metallurgist 2008; 52(11): 625–632. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11015-009-9104-9

Blagojevic D, Lazic D, Keselj D, Skundrić B, Dugic P, Ostojic G. Determining the content of silicon dioxide in bauxites using X-ray fluorescence spectrometry. Iran. J. Chem. Chem. Eng 2019; 38(4). https://doi.org/10.30492/IJCCE.2019.34231

Ostojic G, Lazic D, Zeljkovic S. Determination of the iron oxide content in bauxite: comparing ICP-OES with UV-VIS and volumetric analysis. Chem. Pap. 2020; 75(1): 389-396. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11696-020-01305-z

Idris N, Lahna K, Syamsuddin F, Ramli M. Study on Emission Spectral Lines of Iron, Fe in LaserInduced Breakdown Spectroscopy (LIBS) on Soil Samples. J. Phys. Conf. Ser 2017; 846(012020). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/846/1/012020

Carvalho AAC, Alves VC, Silvestre DM, Leme FO, Oliveira PV, Nomura CS. Comparison of FusedGlass Beads and Pressed Powder Pellets for the Quantitative Measurement of Al, Fe, Si and Ti in Bauxite by Laser Induced Breakdown Spectrometry (LIBS). Geostand. Geoanal. Res. 2017; 41(4): 585–592. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/ggr.12173

Fahad M, Sajjad A, Shah KH, Shahzad A, Abrar M. Quantitative elemental analysis of high silica bauxite using calibration-free laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy. Appl. Opt. 2019; 58(27): 7588-7596. /https://doi.org/htps://doi.org/10.1364/AQ.58.007588

Upendra S, Mishra RS. Simultaneous multielemental analysis of alumina process samples using inductively coupled plasma spectrometry (ICP-AES). Anal. Chem.: Indian J. 2012; 11(1). https://www.tsijournals.com/articles/simultanious-multielemental-analysis-of-alumina-process-samples-using-inductively-coupled-plasma-spectrometry.pdf

Murray RW, Miller DJ, Krys KA. Analysis of major and trace elements in rocks, sediments, and interstitial waters by inductively coupled plasma-atomic emission spectrometry (ICP-AES). ODP Tech. Note, 2000; 29. https://doi.org/10.2973/ODP.TN.29.2000

SPECTRO - Smart Analyzer Vision Software, Online-Help vers. 5.01.09XX. Spectro Analytical Instruments GmbH. 2012

Giavarina D. Understanding Bland Altman analysis. Biochem. Medica 2015; 25(2), 141–151. https://doi.org/10.11613/BM.2015.015

Bilić-Zulle L. Comparison of methods: Passing and Bablok regression. Biochem. Medica 2011; 21 (1): 49–52. https://doi.org/10.11613/bm.2011.010

Medcalc manual, https://www.medcalc.org/manual/mountain-plot.php, Accessed May 23rd 2020

Linsinger T. Comparison of a measurement result with the certified value. Application Note 1, European Reference Materials. 2010; 1–2.

Certificate of Analysis, Standard Reference Material 697, bauxite Dominican, National Institute of Standards and Technology. 1991

Liberatore PA. Determination of Majors in Geological Samples by ICP-OES: Vol. ICP-AES Inst. 1993; 12 https://www.colby.edu/chemistry/CH332/laboratory/Geo-ICP-protocol2.pdf

Hauptkorn S, Pavel J, Seltner H. Determination of silicon in biological samples by ICP-OES after non-oxidative decomposition under alkaline conditions. Fresenius. J. Anal. Chem 2001; 370: 246–250. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002160100759

US. EPA Method 6010D (SW-846): Inductively coupled plasma-atomic emission spectrometry. Washington, DC, USA, 2014. https://www.epa.gov/esam/epa-method-6010d-sw-846-inductively-coupled-plasma-atomic-emission-spectrometry

Simundic AM. Statistical analysis in method comparison studies-Part one. 2016; www.acutecaretesting.org

AOAC (American Association Of Official Analytical Chemists), Appendix F : Guidelines for Standard Method Performance Requirements. 2016. https://www.aoac.org/resources/guidelines-for-standard-method-performance-requirements/

Taftazani A, Roto R, Ananda NR, Murniasih S. Comparison of NAA XRF and ICP-OES Methods on Analysis of Heavy Metals in Coals and Combustion Residues. Indones. J. Chem. 2017; 17(2): 228–237. https://doi.org/10.22146/ijc.17686

Rüdel H, Kӧsters J, Schӧrmann J. Determination of the Elemental Content of Environment Sample using ICP-OES, Guidelines for Chemical Analysis, Fraunhofer Institute for Molecular Biology and Applied Ecology, Schmallenberg, 2007. https://www.ime.fraunhofer.de/content/dam/ime/en/documents/AE/SOP_ICP-OES_en.pdf

Amorin A, Determination of major and minor elements in HF-digested soil samples using an Agilent 5110 ICP-OES, application note, Agilent Technologies.Inc. 2019. https://www.agilent.com/cs/library/applications/application_inert_sample_chamber_icp-oes_5110_5994-1213en_us_agilent.pdf

Krishna AK, Murthy NN, Govil PK. Multielement Analysis of Soils by Wavelength-Dispersive X-ray Fluorescence Spectrometry. At. Spectrosc 2007; 28(6): 202–214. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Keshav-Krishna/publication/233786687_Multielement_Analysis_of_Soils_by_Wavelength-Dispersive_X-ray_Fluorescence_Spectrometry/links/57ecd91a08aebb1961ffc510/Multielement-Analysis-of-Soils-by-Wavelength-Dispersive-X-ray-Fluorescence-Spectrometry.pdf

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.