Regional meeting of journal editors: Struggling of small publishers to survive

Main Article Content

Bojana Obradović
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7276-0442
Boško Rašuo

Abstract

At the end of May 2024, a traditional regional meeting of editors of small scientific journals in engineering disciplines was held at the Faculty of Mechanical Engineering in Belgrade. This year the meeting gathered about 20 editors who discussed novelties, good practices as well as problems in academic publishing. The primary aim of these journals was to support the local scientific community and industry by providing a platform for presenting scientific advances, connecting research and practice, and assisting young scientists in publishing their research results. However, with the widespread adoption of measuring scientific perfor­mance by publication and citation statistics, the scientists lost interest in these journals as underrated in researcher evaluation systems. Thus, low quality of received as well as revised manuscripts, low response rates of reviewers, and, consequently, long processing times and high rejection rates are some of the main problems mentioned at the meeting. All these issues are usually managed by editorial offices, which often have neither technical nor human resources for such endeavors. Still, the conclusion of the meeting was that the benefits of small independent scientific journals are significant and worth efforts particularly for providing an alternative to the profit-oriented publishing and promoting societally relevant research and value-based scientific assessments.

Article Details

Section

Book and Event Review

How to Cite

[1]
B. Obradović and B. Rašuo, “Regional meeting of journal editors: Struggling of small publishers to survive”, Hem Ind, vol. 78, no. 2, pp. 123–129, Jul. 2024, Accessed: Dec. 22, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.ache-pub.org.rs/index.php/HemInd/article/view/1365

References

Neff MW. How academic science gave its soul to the publishing industry. Issues Sci Technol. 2020; 36: 35–43.

Priyanto IF. The struggle of open access publishing: The Indonesian perspective. In: Alemneh D, ed. Handbook of research on the global view of open access and scholarly communications. Hershey, PA: IGI Global; 2022: 65-80. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-9805-4.ch004

Drvenica I, Dekanski A, Buđevac N, Umeljić I, Nedić O. Is there a need for systematic education on peer-reviewing in Serbia? Hem Ind. 2019; 73(5): 275–279. https://doi.org/10.2298/HEMIND191020029D

Holly E. Group to establish standards for AI in papers. Science. 2024; 384(6693): 261. doi: 10.1126/science.z9gp5zo

Obradovic B. Connecting science and industry with improved communication of research results. Hem Ind. 2019; 73(2): 73-77. https://doiserbia.nb.rs/Article.aspx?ID=0367-598X1902073O

Fernandez-Moure JS. Lost in translation: The gap in scientific advancements and clinical application. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2016; 4: Article 43. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2016.00043

Kaltenbrunner W. Situated knowledge production, international impact: Changing publishing practices in a German engineering department. Minerva. 2018; 56: 283-303. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11024-017-9337-x

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>