Assessment of the size of the danger zone caused by an accident during transportation of a dangerous chemical substance

Main Article Content

Aleksandar Ivković
https://orcid.org/0009-0004-6499-4734
Srećko Ilić
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6093-3801
Radovan Radovanović
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7302-8328
Nevena Mladenović (Ignjatov)
https://orcid.org/0009-0002-1168-210X

Abstract

Air pollution is the central topic of all discussions related to environmental protection. Modelling the spread of pollution is one of the methods used to predict the spread paths and levels of pollution and to act in order to combat this problem. The paper presents modelling of dispersion of ammonia through the air using a software tool ALOHA (Areal Locations of Hazardous Atmospheres) based on the Gaussian model of particle dispersion. Modelling in the work is based on data related to the accident that occurred in December 2022 in the vicinity of the city of Pirot, Serbia, as well as on real meteorological data that were collected during the time of the accident and the spread of pollution. As a result of modelling, zones with increased ammonia concentration are obtained. The zone areas will depend on the ammonia concentration at the source and meteorological conditions during the period of the leakage. The aim of the paper is to point out the need to introduce modelling into the operational centres of the local police or military units in charge of emergency situations, as well as additional safety protocols when transporting dangerous goods.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Ivković, A. ., Ilić, S., Radovanović, R., & Mladenović (Ignjatov) , N. . (2024). Assessment of the size of the danger zone caused by an accident during transportation of a dangerous chemical substance. HEMIJSKA INDUSTRIJA (Chemical Industry). https://doi.org/10.2298/HEMIND230715012I
Section
Chemical Engineering - Process Modeling

Funding data

References

Wang R, Xu K, Xu V, Wu Y. Study on prediction model of hazardous chemical accidents. J Loss Prev Proccess Ind. 2020; 68: 104183 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlp.2020.104183.

Zhao L, Qian Y, Hu Q-M, Jiang R, Li M, Wang X. An Analysis of Hazardous Chemical Accidents in China between 2006 and 2017. Sustainability. 2018; 10(8); 2935 https://doi.org/10.3390/su10082935.

Zhang W, Cheng W, Gai W. Hazardous Chemicals Road Transportation Accidents and the Corresponding Evacuation Events from 2012 to 2020 in China: A Review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022; 19(22); 15182 https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192215182.

Jabbari M, Atabi F, Ghorbani R. Key airborne concentrations of chemicals for emergency response planning in HAZMAT road transportation- margin of safety or survival. J Loss Prev Proccess Ind. 2020; 65: 104139 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlp.2020.104139.

Lecue M, Darbra RM. Accidents in European ports involving chemical substances: Characteristics and trends. Safety Science. 2019; 115; 278-284 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2019.02.015.

Jusufranić I, Nešković S, Ketin S, Biočanin R, Management of Transport of Hazardous Materials. Fresenius Environ Bull. 2018; 4325-4331 ISSN: 10184619.

Bondžić J, Sremački M, Popov S, Mihajlović I, Vujić B, Petrović M. Exposure to hazmat road accidents – Toxic release simulation and GIS-based assessment method. Journal of Environmental Management. 2021; 293: 34098356 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112941.

Salmond NH, Wing SR. Sub-lethal and lethal effects of chronic ammonia exposure and hypoxia on a New Zealand bivalve. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology. 2022; 549: 151696 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jembe.2022.151696.

Stojadinović DJ, Đorđević AV, Krstić IM, Radosavljević JM. Atmospheric release of organic solvents due to hazardous events in the paints and varnishes industry. Chem Ind. 2023; 77(2): 111-127 https://doi.org/10.2298/HEMIND220909002S.

Yoo B, Choi SD. Emergency Evacuation Plan for Hazardous Chemicals Leakage Accidents Using GIS-based Risk Analysis Techniques in South Korea. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019; 16(11): 1948 https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16111948.

Nikezić DP, Ramadani UR, Radivojević DS, Lazović IM, Mirkov NS. Deep Learning Model for Global Spatio-Temporal Image Prediction. Mathematics. 2022; 10(18): 3392 https://doi.org/10.3390/math10183392.

Macêdo MFM, Ramos ALD. Vehicle atmospheric pollution evaluation using AERMOD model at avenue in a Brazilian capital city. Air Qual Atmos Heal. 2020; 13(3): 309-320 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11869-020-00792-z.

Sharipov D, Muradov F, Akhmedov D. Numerical Modeling Method For Short-Term Air. Applied Mathematics E-notes. 2018; 575-584 ISSN 1607-2510.

Zhou L, Li Z, Meng L, Li T, Domingos Raimundo Lopes N. Environmental Risk Assessment for PM2.5 Pollution from Non-Point Sources in the Mining Area Based on Multi-Source Superposition and Diffusion. Sustainability. 2021; 13(12): 6619 https://doi.org/10.3390/su13126619.

Brzozowska L. Computer simulation of impacts of a chlorine tanker truck accident. Transportation research part D: transport and environment. 2016; 43: 107-122 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2015.12.001.

Yang Z, Yao Q, Buser MD, Alfieri JG, Li H, Torrents A, McConnell LL, Downey PM, Hapeman CJ. Modification and validation of the Gaussian plume model (GPM) to predict ammonia and particulate matter dispersion. Atmospheric Pollution Research. 2020; 11(7): 1063-1072 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apr.2020.03.012.

Cao B, Cui W, Chen C, Chen Y. Development and uncertainty analysis of radionuclide atmospheric dispersion modeling codes based on Gaussian plume model. Energy. 2020; 194: 116925 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2020.116925.

Li H, Zhang J, Yi J. Computational source term estimation of the Gaussian puff dispersion. Soft Computing. 2019; 23: 59-75 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-018-3440-2.

Mohamed F, Fadzil SM, Siong KK. A Study on the Atmospheric Dispersion of Radionuclide Released from TRIGA MARK II Reactor using Gaussian Plume Model. Sains Malaysiana. 2019; 48(9): 2021-2028 http://doi.org/10.17576/jsm-2019-4809-23.

Lazaridis M. First Principles of Meteorology and Air Pollution. New York: Springer; 2011: e-ISBN 201-232 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0162-5.

Jaćimovski S, Miladinović S, Radovanović R, Ilijazi V. Use of Gaussian Mathematical Model in the Distribution of Sulphur Dioxide into the Atmosphere from Point Source. Technical Gazette. 2017; 24(1): 157-162 https://doi.org/10.17559/TV-20150716093937.

Tahmid M, Dey S, Syeda SR. Mapping human vulnerability and risk due to chemical accidents. J Loss Prev Proccess Ind. 2020; 68: 104289 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlp.2020.104289.

Lyu S, Zhang S, Huang X, Peng S, Li J. Investigation and modeling of the LPG tank truck accident in Wenling, China. Process Safety and Environmental Protection. 2022; 157: 493-508 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2021.10.022.

Orozco JL, Van Caneghem J, Hens L, González L, Lugo R, Díaz S, Pedroso I. Assessment of an ammonia incident in the industrial area of Matanzas. Journal of cleaner production. 2019; 222: 934-941 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.03.024.

Hoscan O, Cetinyokus S. Determination of emergency assembly point for industrial accidents with AHP analysis. J Loss Prev Proccess Ind. 2021; 69: 104386 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlp.2020.104386.

Iskender H. Risk assessment for an acetone storage tank in a chemical plant in Istanbul, Turkey: Simulation of dangerous scenarios. Process Safety Progress. 2021; 40(4): 234-239 https://doi.org/10.1002/prs.12252.

Terzioglu L, Iskender H. Modeling the consequences of gas leakage and explosion fire in liquefied petroleum gas storage tank in Istanbul technical university, Maslak campus. Process Safety Progress. 2021; 40(4): 319-326 https://doi.org/10.1002/prs.12263.

Meteoblue – weather close to you. https://www.meteoblue.com. Accessed 25.04.2023.

Weather2Umbrella. https://www.weather2umbrella.com. Accessed 25.04.2023.