THE DRYING KINETICS AND CHARACTERISTICS OF SHRIMP DRIED BY CONVENTIONAL METHODS

Scientific paper

Authors

  • ALI CAN ERSAN Yildiz Technical University, Faculty of Chemical and Metallurgical Engineering, Department of Chemical Engineering, Istanbul, Turkey and Istanbul Esenyurt University, Vocational High School, Department of Occupational Health and Safety, Istanbul, Turkey
  • NURCAN TUGRUL Yildiz Technical University, Faculty of Chemical and Metallurgical Engineering, Department of Chemical Engineering, Istanbul, Turkey

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.2298/CICEQ201114050E

Keywords:

shrimp, drying kinetics, rehydration, protein content, color analysis, heavy metal

Abstract

The main purpose of this study was to research the influence of different drying methods on the physical and qualitative properties of dried shrimps. Shrimps were dried with conventional methods at 60, 70 and 80 °C between 330 to 210 min and 190 to 110 min, in an oven and vacuum oven respectively. Drying time was shortened with the use of a vacuum pump. The drying kinetics of the shrimp were studied, and effective moisture diffusion and activation energy were calculated for both methods. The Alibas model and the Midilli and Kucuk model provided the best experimental data with a high coefficient of determin­ation (R2) for the oven and vacuum oven techniques, respectively. The final dried products were characterized by investigating the color characteristics, heavy metal content and by carrying out protein analyses. The rehydration ratio was also determined for the dehydrated shrimps. Drying conditions affected the color features so that shrimps dried in ovens and vacuum ovens showed an increase in brightness and yellowness values and a decrease in redness values. The concentration of As, Pb, Cd, Hg, Cu, Zn and Fe in the dried shrimp were within acceptable limits. The protein content of dried shrimp (around 85%) is higher than that of undried shrimp (around 20%).

References

S.H.M. Ashtiani, M. Rafiee, M.M. Morad, M. Khojastehpour, M.R. Khani, A. Rohani, B. Shokri, A. Martynenko, Innov. Food Sci. Emerg. Technol. 63 (2020) 102381

A.S. Kipcak, İ. Doymaz, Chem. Ind. Chem. Eng. Q. 26 (2020) 203−212

M. Başlar, M. Kılıçlı, O. S. Toker, O. Sağdıç, M. Arici, Innov. Food Sci. Emerg. Technol. 26 (2014) 182-190

I. Doymaz, A.S. Kipcak, S. Piskin, Czech J. Food Sci. 33 (2015) 83-90

I. Doymaz, A.S. Kipcak, S. Piskin, Czech J. Food Sci. 33 (2015) 367-376

N.A. Latiff, L.C. Abdullah, P.Y. Ong, N.A.M. Amin, Chem. Ind. Chem. Eng. Q. 27 (2021)199-206

S.H.M. Ashtiani, B. Sturm, A. Nasirahmadi, Heat Mass Transf. 54 (2018) 915–927

M.V. Traffano-Schiffo, M. Castro-Giráldez, P.J. Fito, N. Balaguer, J. Food Eng. 128 (2014) 103–110

W. Jangsawang, Energy Proc. 138 (2017) 1048-1054

E. Corona, J.V. Garcia-Perez, T.E.G. Alvarez-Arenas, N. Watson, M.J.V. Povey, J. Benedito, J. Food Eng. 119 (2013) 464-470

M.J. Cantalejo, F. Zouaghi, I. Perez-Arnedo, Food Sci. Technol. 68 (2016) 400-407

E. Dinçer, M. Erbaş, Meat Sci. 145 (2018) 114-120

J. Akhtar, P.K. More, Int. J. Chem. Stud. 6 (2018) 1590-1597

T. Tsuruta, T. Hayashi, Dry. Technol. 25 (2007) 1393–1399

S. Tirawanichakul, W.N. Phatthalung, Y. Tirawanichakul, J. Sci. Technol. 5 (2008) 77-100

M. Zhang, H. Chen, A. S. Mujumdar, J. Tang, S. Miao, Y. Wang, Crit. Rev. Food Sci. 57 (2017) 1239-1255

C. A. Komolafe, I. O. Oluwaleye, A. O. D. Adejumo, M. A. Waheed, S. I. Kuye, Int. J. Heat Technol. 36 (2018) 1262-1267

Y. Bai, B. Sun, J. Food. Process. Pres. 35 (2011) 891-897

S. Bellagha, E. Amami, A. Farhat, N. Kechaou, Dry. Technol. 20 (2002) 1527-1538

D. Jain, P.B. Pathare, J. Food Eng. 78 (2007) 1315-1319

A.S. Kipcak, Res. Chem. Intermed. 43 (2017) 1429-1445

A.S. Kipcak, I. Doymaz, E.M. Derun, Chem. Ind. Chem. Eng. Q. 25 (2019) 1-10

AOAC (Association of Official Analytical Chemists), Offi¬cial Methods of Analysis of AOAC International, 16th ed., AOAC International, Rockville, MD, 1995

A. Vega-Gálvez, I. Quispe-Fuentes, E. Uribe, J. Martinez-Monzo, A. Pasten, R. Lemus-Mondaca, J. Food. 17 (2019) 297-306

A.S. Kipcak, O. İsmail J. Food Sci. Technol. (2020), DOI 10.1007/s13197-020-04540-0

F. Sarpong, C. Zho, J. Bai, L.P. Amenorfe, M.K. Golly, H. Ma, Food Sci. Biotechnol. 28 (2019) 75-85

N.P. Zogzas, Z.B. Maroulis, D. Marinos-Kouris, Food Sci. Biotechnol. 14 (1996) 2225-2253

P. Saadchom, T. Swasdisevi, A. Nathakaranakule, S. Soponronnarit, Food Sci. Biotechnol. 104 (2011) 105-113

Y.G. Gu, Q. Lin, X.H. Wang, F.Y. Du, Z.L. Yu, H. H. Huang, Mar. Pollut. Bull. 96 (2015) 508-512

M. Tuzen, Food Chem. Toxicol. 47 (2009) 1785–1790

Y. A. Candra, M. Syaifullah, B. Irawan, T.W.C. Putranto, D. Hidayati, A. Soegianto, Reg. Stud. Mar. Sci. 26 (2019) 100507

A. Anandkumar, R. Nagarajan, K. Prabakaran, R. Rajaram, Reg. Stud. Mar. Sci. 16 (2017) 79–88

FAO, Compilation of Legal Limits for Hazardous Sub-stance in Fish and Fishery Products. Food and Agri-cultural Organization, Fishery circular No. 764, 1983

WHO, Heavy Metals Environmental Aspects. Environ-mental Health Criteria, World Health Organization, Geneva, 1989

MAFF, Monitoring and surveillance of non-radioactive contaminants in the aquatic environment and activities regulating the disposal of wastes at sea, 1993. Aquatic Environment Monitoring Report No. 44, Direcorate of Fisheries Research, Lowestoft, 1995

EC, 2008. Commission Regulation. No 629/2008 of July 2008 amending Regulation (EC) No 1881/2006 setting maximum levels for certain contaminants in foodstuffs.

EC, Commission Regulation No. 488/2014 of 12 May 2014 Amending Regulation (EC) No 1881/2006 as regards maximum levels of cadmium in foodstuffs, 2014

Turkish Food Codex, Regulation of Setting Maximum Levels for Certain Contaminants in Foodstuffs, Official Gazette, 23 September 2002, Issue 24885

S. Volker, E. Dana, World Euphausiacea database, World Register of Marine Species 67 (1852) 370–372.

Downloads

Published

05.01.2022

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

THE DRYING KINETICS AND CHARACTERISTICS OF SHRIMP DRIED BY CONVENTIONAL METHODS: Scientific paper. (2022). Chemical Industry & Chemical Engineering Quarterly, 27(4), 319-328. https://doi.org/10.2298/CICEQ201114050E

Similar Articles

71-80 of 87

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Most read articles by the same author(s)