FACTORIAL DESIGN AND SURFACE METHOD TO OPTIMIZE ETHYLIC BIODIESEL PRODUCTION FROM CHICKEN WASTES

Original scientific paper

Authors

  • LUIZ DANIEL DA SILVA NETO Department of Chemical Engineering, Federal University of São Carlos Rodovia Washington Luís, São Carlos - São Paulo, Brazil
  • PAULO VICTOR FERREIRA LOZ Laboratory of Separation and Process Optimization Systems, Technology Center, Federal University of Alagoas, Maceió, Alagoas, Brazil
  • JOÃO INÁCIO SOLETTI Laboratory of Separation and Process Optimization Systems, Technology Center, Federal University of Alagoas, Maceió, Alagoas, Brazil
  • DAYANA DE GUSMÃO COÊLHO Laboratory of Separation and Process Optimization Systems, Technology Center, Federal University of Alagoas, Maceió, Alagoas, Brazil

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.2298/CICEQ191117034S

Keywords:

biodiesel, chicken wastes, ethyl transesterification, optimization

Abstract

To produce biodiesel, one of the most important factors is the quality of the oil used in the production. However, other factors such as price and availability should also be taken into consideration. Chicken wastes oil shows a very promising option for this sector, since it comes from a waste. The aim of the present study was a methodology for extraction and characterization of chicken wastes oil for production of biodiesel by ethylic transesterification, besides presenting the characterization and optimization of the process vari­ables of the production of biodiesel, the applying of RSM involving CCD. The investigation was performed following evaluation of the characterization para­meters for the oil: viscosity, density, acidity index, moisture of the sample, ref­ractive index, and saponification index. For biodiesel, viscosity, density, acidity index and ester content were evaluated. An optimum point was reached for the production of chicken biodiesel where the concentration of the catalyst is 2.1% by mass, the oil/ethanol ratio is 1:5.5 and the reaction temperature of 30 °C; at that point, a 95% conversion was achieved. At the optimum point obtained from the statistical technique for a p-value of 0.05 the results found for the phys­ical-chemical characterization of biodiesel are found in the ANP standards.

References

S. Kumar, P. Dinesha, I. Bran, Energy 140 (2017) 98–105.

M. Kirubakaran, V. Arul Mozhi Selvan, J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 6 (2018) 4490–4503

M. Kirubakaran, V. Arul Mozhi Selvan, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 82 (2018) 390–401

M. Mofijur, M.G. Rasul, J. Hyde, A.K. Azad, R. Mamat, M.M.K. Bhuiya, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 53 (2016) 265–278

V. Singh, M. Yadav, Y.C. Sharma, Fuel 203 (2017) 360–369

B.C. Klein, A. Bonomi, R.M. Filho, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 82 (2018) 1376–1392

P.R. Pandit, M.H. Fulekar, J. Environ. Manage. 198 (2017) 319–329

U. Rajak, P. Nashine, T.N. Verma, Fuel. 268 (2020) 117305

S. Salam, T.N. Verma, Energy Convers. Manage. 180 (2019) 496–510

A.B. Fadhil, I.K. Saeed, L.I. Saeed, M.H. Altamer, Energy Sources, Part A Recover. Util. Environ. Eff. 38 (2016) 2883–2890

A. Piker, B. Tabah, N. Perkas, A. Gedanken, Fuel. 182 (2016) 34–41

M. Gülüm, M.K. Yesilyurt, A. Bilgin, Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 27 (2020) 10351–10366

T.S. Singh, T.N. Verma, Energy Convers. Manage. 182 (2019) 383–397

T. Ito, Y. Sakurai, Y. Kakuta, M. Sugano, K. Hirano, Fuel Process. Technol. 94 (2012) 47–52

G.I. Martins, D. Secco, H.A. Rosa, R. Bariccatti, B.D. Dolci, S.N.M. Souza, R.F. Santos, T.R.B. Silva, F. Gurgacz, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 42 (2015) 154–157

A. Cunha, V. Feddern, M.C. De Prá, M.M. Higarashi, P.G. De Abreu, Fuel. 105 (2013) 228–234

Brazilian Association of Animal Proteins, Brazilian statistical yearbook, http://abpa br.com.br/storage/files/ /relatorio-anual-2018.pdf (accessed 20 February 2018)

M.K. Yesilyurt, M. Arslan, T. Eryilmaz, Int. Journal Green Energy 16 (2019) 60–71

A. Rojas-González, E. Girón-Gallego, Ing. Univ. 15 (2011) 197–218

D.C. Antonio, L.P. Amancio, I.G. Rosset, Catal. Lett. 148 (2018) 3214–3222

B. Barros Neto, I.S. Scarminio, R.E. Bruns, Como fazer experimentos: pesquisa e desenvolvimento na ciência e na indústria, B. Barros Neto, Ed., Editora Unicamp, Campinas, 2002, p. 251

A. Amin, A. Gadallah, A.K. El Morsi, N.N. El-Ibiari, G.I. El-Diwani, Egypt. J. Pet. 25 (2016) 509–514

W. Yuan, A.C. Hansen, Q. Zhang, Z. Tan, J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 82 (2005) 195–199

D. Bajpai, V.K. Tyagi, J. Oleo Sci. 55 (2006) 487–502

B.R. Moser, Vitr. Cell. Dev. Biol. Plant. 45 (2009) 229–266

L.C. Meher, D. Vidya Sagar, S.N. Naik, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 10 (2006) 248–268

B. Freedman, E. Pryde, T. Mounts, J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 61 (1984) 1638–1643

K.S. Liu, J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 71 (1994) 1179–1187

M.C. Chiu, R. Grimaldi, L.A. Gioielli, Rev. Bras. Ciencias Farm. J. Pharm. Sci. 43 (2007) 421–434

M.C. Chiu, L.A. Gioielli, Ciênc. Tecnol. Aliment. 22 (2002) 151–157

S. Gugule, F. Fatimah, Y. Rampoh, Anim. Prod. 13 (2009) 115–121

T.M. Mata, N. Cardoso, M. Ornelas, S. Neves, N.S. Caetano, Energy and Fuels. 25 (2011) 4756–4762

K.-H. Chung, J. Kim, K.-Y. Lee, Biomass Bioenergy 33 (2009) 155–158

I.B. Banković-Ilić, I.J. Stojković, O.S. Stamenković, V.B. Veljkovic, Y.T. Hung, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 32 (2014) 238–254

A. Sagiroglu, Ş.S. Isbilir, H.M. Ozcan, H. Paluzar, N.M. Toprakkiran, Chem. Ind. Chem. Eng. Q. 17 (2011) 53–58

G. Simonelli, C. Moraes, C.A. de Moraes Pires, L.C.L. dos Santos, Chem. Ind. Chem. Eng. Q. 25 (2019) 183–192.

Downloads

Published

14.07.2021

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

FACTORIAL DESIGN AND SURFACE METHOD TO OPTIMIZE ETHYLIC BIODIESEL PRODUCTION FROM CHICKEN WASTES: Original scientific paper. (2021). Chemical Industry & Chemical Engineering Quarterly, 27(2), 155-163. https://doi.org/10.2298/CICEQ191117034S

Similar Articles

41-47 of 47

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.