EFFECT OF SALT BATH NITRIDING ON TRIBOLOGICAL PROPERTIES OF AISI52100 STEEL COATINGS USING RESPONSE SURFACE METHODOLOGY

Original scientific paper

Authors

  • Kumutha Ramalingam Department of Mechanical Engineering, Loyola Institute of Technology, Palanchur, Chennai- 600123, India https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1173-8532
  • Ilaiyavel Sivakumaran Department of Mechanical Engineering, Sri Venkateswara College of Engineering, Pennalur, Sriperumbudur, Chennai- 602 117, India https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3051-5123
  • Mathanbabu Mariappan Department of Mechanical Engineering, Government College of Engineering, Bargur-635104, Krishnagiri, Tamilnadu, India https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1306-8990
  • Barathiraja Rajendran Department of Mechanical Engineering, Einstein College of Engineering, Tirunelveli- 627012, Tamilnadu, India https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4815-7491

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.2298/CICEQ230824002R

Keywords:

Salt bath Nitriding, wear, hardness, coefficient of friction, lubrication

Abstract

This investigation employs the salt bath nitriding to extend the service life and improve the surface characteristics of AISI 52100, commonly employed in bearing applications. A wear test was conducted using a pin-on-disc device according to the ASTM G-99 standard, and the findings show a 30% reduction in wear loss. Sliding wear experiments were conducted at 1.5 m/s with a 5 N force at room temperature on uncoated and nitrided pins which was obtained as optimum value from RSM. The three variables and five levels of central composite design (CCD) were utilized to reduce the number of trials and the model relations were examined through ANOVA. Surface hardness, friction coefficient, wear coefficient, and loss in wear are measured over pins without coating and nitride pins. Investigations were done into how 5W30 oil affected passive and drip lubrication. Nitride substrates had a hardness of 590 HV. Also, nitriding has a favorable effect on the friction coefficient, lowering it by up to 23%. The 5W30 lubricant will further decrease the friction coefficient. The lowest friction coefficient was seen with the addition of 14% drip oil lubrication. Significantly less wear loss in the pin was caused by a combination of high hardness and low friction coefficient.

References

D. Umbrello, J. Hua, R. Shivpuri, Mater. Sci. Eng. A. 374(1-2) (2004) 90—100. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2004.01.012.

A. Bendavid, P.J. Martin, T.J. Kinder, E.W. Preston, Surf. Coat. Tech. 163-164 (2003) 347—352. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0257-8972(02)00623-0.

E.M. Berton, B.C.E.S. Kurelo, A.C. Rovani, T. Cousseau, J.C.K. das Neves, G. Pintaude, P.C. Borges, Surf. Topogr.: Metrol. Prop. 10 (2022) 24006. https://doi.org/10.1088/2051-672X/ac7b3a.

Y. Lin, J. Wang, D,J. .Zeng, Materi. Eng. Perform. 22 (2013) 2567—2573. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-013-0545-8.

J. Wang, Y. Lin, Metall. Mater. Trans. B. 44 (2013) 1010—1016. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11663-013-9841-9.

H. Aydin, A. Bayram, Ş. Topçu, Mater. Sci. 19(1) (2013) 19—24. https://doi.org/10.5755/j01.ms.19.1.3819.

A. Mahmoudi, M. Esmailian, Adv. Mater. Res. 83-86 (2009) 41—48. http://dx.doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.83-86.41.

S.C. Sharma, V. Singh, V.K. Chawla, Wear 257(1-2), (2005) 86—95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2019.125216.

K.D. Bakoglidis, I. Nedelcu, I.G. Ivanov, R. Meeuwenoord, S. Schmidt, E. Janzan, P. Ehret, G. Greczynski, L. Hultman, Tribol. Int. 114 (2017) 141—151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.triboint.2017.04.006.

L. Hua, T. Jurkschat, T. Lohne, K. Stahl, Lubricants 6(2)

(2018) 47. https://doi.org/10.3390/lubricants6020047.

I. Saravanan, A.E. Perumal, S.C. Vettivel, N. Selvakumar, A. Baradeswaran, Mater. Des. 67 (2015) 469—482. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2014.10.051.

P.S. Charan, K. Jayakumar, D. Alankrutha, G. Sindhu, R. Subbiah, Mater. Today Proc. 27 (2020) 1541—1544, https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MATPR.2020.03.195.

A. Deshini, S. Sathish, S. Krishnaraj, A. Kumar, J. Saranya, V.S. Viswanth, R. Subbiah, Mater. Today Proc. 82 (2023) 217—221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2023.01.119.

S. Srikanth, A.A. Johnson, N. Sateesh, A. Kumar, J. Saranya, V.S. Viswanth, R. Subbiah, Mater. Today Proc. 82 (2023.) 47—52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2022.11.262.

J. Wang, Y. Lin, H. Fan, D. Zeng, Q. Peng, B. Shen, JMEP, 21 (2012) 1708—1713. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-011-0077-z.

E. Colombini, R. Sola, G.I.A.N. Parigi, P. Veronesi, G. Poli, Metall. Mater. Trans. A. 45 (2014) 5562—5573, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11661-014-2490-z.

A.R. Hamad, J.H. Abboud, F.M. Shuaeib, K.Y. Benyounis, Adv. Eng. Softw. 41(4) (2010) 674—679, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advengsoft.2009.10.010.

T. Peng, M. Dai, W. Cai, W. Wei, K. Wei, J. Hu, Appl. Surf. Sci. 484 (2019) 610—615. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2019.04.134.

V.T. Bonow, D.S. Maciel, N.L. Fenner, A.R.A. Zimmer, C.G. Zimmer, Clean. Eng. Technol. 4, (2021) 100169, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clet.2021.100169.

A. Pattanaik, V. Rayasam, Adv. Powder Technol. 29 (2018) 3404—3414. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apt.2018.09.021.

C. Gopinath, P. Lakshmanan, S. Palani, Mater. Manuf. Process. 37 (2022) 985—994. https://doi.org/10.1080/10426914.2021.1981939.

J. Spille, J. Wranik, S. Barteldes, J. Mayer, A. Schwedt, M. Zurcher, T. Lutz, L. Wang, W. Holweger, Wear. 477 (2021) 203864. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wear.2021.203864.

A.P. de Andrade Manfridini, G.C.D. de Godoy, L.de Arruda Santos, J. Mater. Res. Technol. 6 (2017) 65—70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2016.07.001.

B. Liu, S. Bruni, R. Lewis. Wear 490-491 (2022) 204188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wear.2021.204188.

L.J. Yang, Wear. 225 (1999) 557—562. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1648(98)00380-9.

G. Yan, S. Lu, M. Zhang, J. Wang, X. Yang, Z. Zhang, J. Gu, C. Li, Appl. Surf. Sci. 530 (2020) 147306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2020.147306.

W. Grzesik, Z. Zalisz, S. Krol, P. Nieslony, Wear 261(11-12) (2006) 1191—1200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wear.2006.03.004.

E.L. Dalibon, G. Prieto, W.R. Tuckart, S.P. Brühl, Surf. Topogr.: Metrol. Prop. 10 (2022) 34003. https://doi.org/10.1088/2051-672X/ac8946.

L.D. Tadepalli, A.M. Gosala, L. Kondamuru, S.C. Bairi, A.A. Lakshmi, R. Subbiah, E3S Web Conf. 184 (2020) 01020. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202018401020.

J. Ping, X. Cui, J. Pu, X. Jiang, X. Zhang, Y. Zhong, Surf. Topogr.: Metrol. Prop. 8 (2020) 15005. https://doi.org/10.1088/2051-672X/ab6438.

A. Peric, B. Nedic, D. Trifkovic, M. Vuruna, J. Mech. Eng. 59 (2013) 443—450. http://doi.org/10.5545/sv-jme.2012.870.

L. Govind Sanjeev Kumar, D. Thirumalaikumarasamy, K. Karthikeyan, M. Mathanbabu, T. Sonar, Int. J. Interact. Des. Manuf. (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12008-023-01501-7.

M. Mathanbabu, D. Thirumalaikumarasamy, M. Tamilselvi, S. Kumar, Mater. Res. Express. 9 (2022) 096505. https://doi.org/10.1088/2053-1591/ac8857.

S. Seshaiah, D. Sampathkumar, M. Mariappan, A. Mohankumar, G. Balachandran, M. Kaliyamoorthy, R. Gopal, Adv. Mater. Sci. Eng. (2022) 2022. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/6022550.

S. Taktak, S. Ulker, I. Gunes, Surf. Coat. Tech. 202(14) (2008) 3367—3377. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2007.12.015.

A. Mohankumar, T. Duraisamy, D. Sampathkumar, S. Ranganathan, G. Balachandran, M. Kaliyamoorthy, M. Mariappan, L. Mulugeta, J. Nanomater. (2022) 7900150. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/7900150.

H. Nazari, H. Aghajani, F.H.S. Al-Azawi, Surf. Topogr.: Metrol. Prop. 10 (2022) 15049. https://doi.org/10.1088/2051-672X/ac5a73.

A. Alok, M. Das, J. Manuf. Process. 46 (2019) 16—25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2019.08.016.

M.S. Liborio, G.B. Praxedes, L.L.F. Lima, I.G. Nascimento, R.R.M. Sousa, M. Naeem, T.H. Costa, S.M. Alves, J. Iqbal, J. Surf. Coat. Technol. 384 (2020) 125327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2019.125327.

L.R. Bhandarkar, M. Behera, P.P. Mohanty, S.K. Sarangi, Measurement. 172 (2021) 108842. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2020.108842.

Downloads

Published

14.02.2024 — Updated on 18.06.2024

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

EFFECT OF SALT BATH NITRIDING ON TRIBOLOGICAL PROPERTIES OF AISI52100 STEEL COATINGS USING RESPONSE SURFACE METHODOLOGY: Original scientific paper. (2024). Chemical Industry & Chemical Engineering Quarterly, 30(4), 295-307. https://doi.org/10.2298/CICEQ230824002R

Similar Articles

21-27 of 27

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Most read articles by the same author(s)