EXPERIMENTAL INVESTIGATION OF MICRO-ECM ON MONEL 400 ALLOY USING PARTICLES MIXED ELECTROLYTE

Original scientific paper

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.2298/CICEQ221115013G

Keywords:

Carbon pellets, MOORA, VIKOR, ECMM, metal particles, magnet

Abstract

The machining of extremely hard material in conventional machining requires high energy. Therefore stress-free, burr-free, and high-accuracy machining technique like Electro Chemical Micro Machining (ECMM) with extra features is recommended. To improve efficiency, various electrolytes such as Magnet Associated Electrolytes (MGAE), Metal Particle Mixed Electrolytes (MPME), and Carbon Pellets Mixed Electrolytes (CPME) are employed. The micro-holes were drilled over the work material MONEL 400 alloy. The parameters for the studies are electrolyte type, concentration (g/l), machining voltage (V), and duty cycle (%). The responses of ECMM are estimated through material removal rate (MRR) in µm/sec and overcut in µm. The results are optimized using Multi-objective optimization based on ratio analysis (MOORA) and VlseKriterijumska Optimizacija I Kompromisno Resenje (VIKOR). Both techniques produce the same optimal parameter, 18th experiment CPME, 50% duty cycle, 11 V machining voltage, and 28 g/l electrolyte concentration. It is the best optimal parameter solution for machining. According to the ANOVA table of both, the type of electrolyte plays a 62.6% and 60.37% contribution, respectively, to machining performance. Furthermore, the scanning electron microscope (SEM) image analysis perused on the micro holes to extend the effect of different electrolytes on machining surfaces.

References

T.S. Srivatsan, T.S. Sudarshan, K. Manigandan, Textbook of Manufacturing Techniques for Materials: Engineering and Engineered (1st ed.), CRC Press, Boca Raton (2018), p. 814. https://doi.org/10.1201/b22313.

M. Soundarrajan, R. Thanigaivelan, Russ. J. Electrochem. 57 (2021) 172—182. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1023193521020117.

T. Singh, D.K. Mishra, P. Dixit, J. Appl. Electrochem. 52 (2022) 667—682. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10800-021-01662-x.

C. Zhao, T. Huang, J. Wang, L. Xu, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 121 (2022) 3067—3078. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-022-09482-9.

V. Sharma, P. Gupta, J. Ramkumar, J. Manuf. Processes. 75 (2022) 110—124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2022.01.006.

H. S. Panda, K. Mishra, B. Bhattacharyya, J. Electrochem. Soc. 169 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1149/1945-7111/ac6e8e.

J.R. VinodKumaar, R. Thanigaivelan, M. Soundarrajan, Mater. Manuf. Processes. (2022) 1—14. https://doi.org/10.1080/10426914.2022.2030874.

L. Gokulanathan, A. Jegan, Int. J. Electrochem. Sci. 17 (2022) 2. https://doi.org/10.20964/2022.08.55.

J.R.K.V. Kumaar, R. Thanigaivelan, M. Soundarrajan, Chem. Ind. Chem. Eng. Q. 28(4) (2022) 329—337. https://doi.org/10.2298/CICEQ211204007V.

T.G. Arul, V. Perumal, R. Thanigaivelan, Chem. Ind. Chem. Eng. Q. 28 (2022) 247—253. https://doi.org/10.2298/CICEQ210501036A.

A. Vats, A. Dvivedi, P. Kumar, Mater. Manuf. Processes. 36 (2021) 677—692. https://doi.org/10.1080/10426914.2020.1866189.

E. Rajkeerthi, P. Hariharan, N. Pradeep, Mater. Manuf. Processes. 36 (2021) 488—500. https://doi.org/10.1080/10426914.2020.1843672.

M. Soundarrajan, R. Thanigaivelan, S. Maniraj, In Advances in Industrial Automation and Smart Manufacturing, Springer, Singapore (2021), p. 367—376.

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-4739-3_30.

R. Shanmugam, M. Ramoni, G. Thangamani, M. Thangaraj, Metals. 11 (2021) 778. https://doi.org/10.3390/met11050778.

M. Soundarrajan, R. Thanigaivelan, Mater. Manuf. Processes. 35 (2020) 775—782. https://doi.org/10.1080/10426914.2020.1740252.

V. Subburam, S. Ramesh, R.M. Arunachalam, R. Thanigaivelan, In Proceedings of the second international conference on advances in materials processing and characterisation-AMPC (2013), p. 799—806.

G. Wang, Y. Zhang, H. Li, J. Tang, Materials. 13 (2020) 5780. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13245780.

S. Liu, T. Geethapriyan, T. Muthuramalingam, R. Shanmugam, Ramoni, Arch. Civ. Mech. Eng. 22 (2022) 1—15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43452-022-00478-6.

S. Zhan, Y. Zhao, J. Mater. Process. Technol. 291 (2021) 117049. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2021.117049.

M. Deraman, S. Zakaria, R. Omar, A.A. Aziz, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 39 (2000) L1236. https://doi.org/10.1143/JJAP.39.L1236.

P. Kapitza, Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A, 123 (1929) 292—341. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1929.0072.

Jadidi, R.B. Azhiri, R. Teimouri, Int. J. Lightweight Mater. Manuf. 3 (2020) 265—276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlmm.2020.02.004.

R. Kumar, R. Thanigaivelan, G.K. Rajanikant, T. Jagadeesha, J. Das, J. Aust. Ceram. Soc. 57 (2021) 107—116. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41779-020-00517-6.

Jahan, F. Mustapha, M. Y. Ismail, S. M. Sapuan, M. Bahraminasab, Mater. Des. 32 (2011) 1215—1221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2010.10.015.

M. Soundarrajan, R. Thanigaivelan, In Advances in Micro and Nano Manufacturing and Surface Engineering, Springer, Singapore (2019), p. 423—434.

Pramanik, Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf. 86 (2014) 44—61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2014.07.00.

H. Majumder, K. Maity, Measurement. 118 (2018) 1—13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2018.01.003.

K. Matsuzawa, S. Oka, M. Uchiyama, Procedia CIRP. 113 (2022) 483—487. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2022.09.204.

J. Wang, W. Natsu, Precis. Eng.77 (2022) 307—319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.precisioneng.2022.06.012.

Z. Ge, W. Chen, Chin. J. Mech. Eng. 35 (2022) 98. https://doi.org/10.1186/s10033-022-00752-x.

Downloads

Published

26.06.2023 — Updated on 06.10.2023

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

EXPERIMENTAL INVESTIGATION OF MICRO-ECM ON MONEL 400 ALLOY USING PARTICLES MIXED ELECTROLYTE: Original scientific paper. (2023). Chemical Industry & Chemical Engineering Quarterly, 30(1), 81-88. https://doi.org/10.2298/CICEQ221115013G

Similar Articles

21-30 of 31

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.