IMPROVEMENT OF THE MONOCHLOROBENZENE SEPARATION PROCESS THROUGH HEAT INTEGRATION: A SUSTAINABILITY-BASED ASSESSMENT

Scientific paper

Authors

  • Ana Paula R. Paiva Department of Chemical and Petroleum Engineering, Universidade Federal Fluminense, Niterói, RJ 156, 24210-420, Brazil https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2226-0535
  • Rafael O. Santos Chemical Engineering Program, COPPE, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, 21941-972, Brazil https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0493-6784
  • Mônica P. Maia Department of Chemical and Petroleum Engineering, Universidade Federal Fluminense, Niterói, RJ 156, 24210-420, Brazil
  • Diego M. Prata Department of Chemical and Petroleum Engineering, Universidade Federal Fluminense, Niterói, RJ 156, 24210-420, Brazil https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0422-5528

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.2298/CICEQ220311011P

Keywords:

Eco-efficiency, Heat integration, Monochlorobenzene, Process simulation, Sustainability indicators, Utility Plants

Abstract

Chlorobenzene is an important chemical intermediate in the production of commodities, such as herbicides, dyestuffs, and rubber. In this work, a heat integration was proposed for a monochlorobenzene separation process. The conventional process structure and the proposed integrated one were designed and simulated. An optimization focused on minimizing the cooling and heating costs was performed to obtain the best-operating conditions for the heat integration. The simulation of a utility plant, including cooling water and steam generation sections, was also carried out for more accurate estimations of CO2 emissions, water, energy consumption, and operating costs. The processes were evaluated and compared in terms of their sustainable performances using the eco-efficiency comparison index method and environmental and economic indicators, such as CO2 emission, water consumption, and utility cost, to assess the benefits of heat integration. The results demonstrated that the proposed strategy reduced around 57% of all environmental impacts and utility costs.  As the composite evaluation index from the performance indicators showed, the proposed optimal heat integrated industrial plant significantly improved the initial processes’ eco-efficiencies, up to 83%, proving a suitable strategy for a more sustainable process.

References

United Nations. Transforming Our World: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (2015), sdgs.un.org/2030agenda [accessed 14 March 2022].

A.J. Tula, M. Eden, R. Gani, AIChE J. 66 (2019) 16819. https://doi.org/10.1002/aic.16819

R.O. Santos, L.S. Santos, D.M. Prata, J. Cleaner Prod. 186 (2018) 821—830. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.108

P.V. Mangili, D.M. Prata, Chem. Eng. Process. 135 (2019) 93—107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cep.2018.11.020

P.C. Gonçalves, L.P.C. Monteiro, L.S. Santos, J. Cleaner Prod. 270 (2020) 122322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122322

P.G. Junqueira, P.V. Mangili, R.O. Santos, L.S. Santos, D.M. Prata, Chem. Eng. Process. 130 (2018) 309—325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cep.2018.06.010

P.G. Junqueira, I.N. Caxiano, P.V. Mangili, D.M. Prata, Comput. Chem. Eng. 136 (2020) 106783. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compchemeng.2020.106783

P.V. Mangili, D.M. Prata, Chem. Eng. Sci. 212 (2020) 115313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2019.115313

I.N. Caxiano, P.G. Junqueira, P.V. Mangili, D.M. Prata, Chem. Eng. Process. 147 (2020) 107784. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cep.2019.107784

H.N.C. da Silva, D.M. Prata, L.P. Zotes, L.V. Mattos, J. Cleaner. Prod. 200 (2018) 598—608. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.07.120

D.M. Prata, E.L. Lima, J.C. Pinto, Macromol. Symp. 271 (2008) 26—37. https://doi.org/10.1002/masy.200851104

S. Sitter, Q. Chen, I.E. Grossmann, Curr. Opin. Chem. Eng. 25 (2019) 87—94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coche.2018.12.006

P.V. Mangili, L.S. Santos, D.M. Prata, Comput. Chem. Eng. 130 (2019) 106558. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compchemeng.2019.106558

S.D. Pravasi, in Encyclopedia of Toxicology, P. Wexler Ed., Elsevier, Amsterdam (2014), p. 870—873. eBook ISBN: 9780123864550

C. Güler, in GIS and Geostatistical Techniques for Groundwater Science, Elsevier, Amsterdam (2019), p. 251—268. eBook ISBN: 9780128154144

C.B. Silva, S. Mitri, T. Pavesi, E. Saggioro, J.C. Moreira, Cad. Saúde Colet. 22 (2014) 329—342. https://doi.org/10.1590/1414-462X201400040006

W.D. Seider, D.R. Lewin, J.D. Seader, S. Widagdo, R. Gani, K. Ming Ng, Product and Process Design Principles: Synthesis, Analysis and Evaluation, John Wiley & Sons, West Sussex (2016), p. 784. ISBN: 978-1-119-28263-1

R. Turton, R. Bailie, W.B. Whitting, J.A. Shaeiwitz, D. Bhattacharyya, Analysis, Synthesis and Design of Chemical Processes, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River (2018), p. 243. ISBN: 978-0-13-261812-0

P.Y. Liew, S.R.W. Alwi, J.S. Lim, P.S. Varbanov, J.J. Klemes, Z.A. Manan, J. Cleaner. Prod. 77 (2014) 94—104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.12.047

C.P. Pereira, D.M. Prata, L.S. Santos, L.P.C. Monteiro, Braz. J. Chem. Eng. 35 (2018) 63—84.

https://doi.org/10.1590/0104-6632.20180351s20160370

Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories, www.ipcc-nggip.iges.or.jp/public/2006gl/ [accessed 3 August 2021].

Ministério da Ciência, Tecnologia, Inovações e Comunicações, Fator Médio – Inventários Corporativos, www.gov.br/mcti/pt-br/acompanhe-o-mcti/sirene/dados-e-ferramentas/fatores-de-emissao [accessed 1 August 2021].

U.S. Energy Information Administration, Henry Hub Natural Gas Spot Price, https://www.eia.gov/dnav/ng/hist/rngwhhdA.htm. [accessed 25 November 2021].

J.R. Couper, W.R. Penney, J.R. Fair, S.M. Walas, Chemical Process Equipment: Selection and Design, Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford (2012), p. 223. ISBN: 978-0-12-396959-0.

Graphical Abstract

Downloads

Published

09.06.2022 — Updated on 27.10.2022

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

IMPROVEMENT OF THE MONOCHLOROBENZENE SEPARATION PROCESS THROUGH HEAT INTEGRATION: A SUSTAINABILITY-BASED ASSESSMENT: Scientific paper. (2022). Chemical Industry & Chemical Engineering Quarterly, 29(1), 31-42. https://doi.org/10.2298/CICEQ220311011P