EFFECT OF DIFFERENT ELECTROLYTES ON ELECTROCHEMICAL MICRO-MACHINING OF SS 316L

Scientific paper

Authors

  • Jeevarathnam Ravi Kumar Vinod Kumaar Department of Mechanical Engineering, Mahendra Engineering College (Autonomous), Mahendhirapuri, Namakkal(Dt), Tamil Nadu, India https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3319-1766
  • Rajasekaran Thanigaivelan Department of Mechanical Engineering, Muthayammal Engineering College (Autonomous), Rasipuram, Namakkal (Dt), Tamil Nadu, India-637 408 https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9514-9120
  • Madesh Soundarrajan Department of Mechanical Engineering, Muthayammal Engineering College (Autonomous), Rasipuram-637408, Namakkal (Dt), Tamil Nadu, India-637 408 https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7100-7192

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.2298/CICEQ211204007V

Keywords:

Micro-machining, Weak electrolytes, Electrochemical,, SS 316L, Overcut, MRR,

Abstract

The use of stainless steel 316L (SS 316L) in the medical, marine, aerospace, bio-medical, and automobile sectors increases rapidly. Electrochemical micro-machining (ECMM) is the appropriate method for machining SS 316L due to its burr-free machining surface, no residual stress, and high precision. However, some limitations are found in using strong electrolytes, such as HCl, H2SO4, KOH, NaNO3, and NaCl, which reportedly face difficulties in disposing to the environment and handling issues. Hence, this paper addresses overcoming the disadvantages encountered in the ECMM process when using strong electrolytes to machine SS 316L. Therefore, different organic electrolytes such as tartaric acid (C4H6O6), citric acid (C6H8O7), and a combination of tartaric and citric acid (mixed electrolyte) are considered to select the best electrolyte. Process parameters like machining voltage, duty cycle, and electrolyte concentration are included in determining machining performance. The performance of ECMM is evaluated using material removal rate (MRR) and overcut. The overcut of tartaric acid electrolyte is 179% less than mixed electrolyte for the parameter combination of 12 g/l, 11 V, and 85%. On the other hand, the mixed electrolyte shows 114.2% higher MRR than the tartaric acid electrolyte for the parameter solutions of 25%, 11 V, and 20 g/l. Furthermore, the citric acid electrolyte shows the second-lowest overcut and higher MRR in all aspects of machining performance. Field emission scanning electron microscope (FESEM) studies are carried out to realize the effect of electrolytes on the machining surface.

References

R. Thanigaivelan, R.M. Arunachalam, M. Kumar, B.P. Dheeraj, Mater. Manuf. Process. 33 (2018) 383—389.

S. Ayyappan, K. Sivakumar, M. Kalaimathi,Int. J. Mach. Mach. Mater.17 (2015) 79—94.

S. Maniraj, R. Thanigaivelan, Mater. Manuf. Processes. 34 (2019) 1494—1501.

M.Soundarrajan, R. Thanigaivelan, in Advances in Micro and Nano Manufacturing and Surface Engineering, M. Shunmugam, M. Kanthababu (eds), Springer, (2019), pp. 423—434.

F. Zheng, X. Ou, Q. Pan, X. Xiong, C. Yang, M. Liu,J. Power Sources 346 (2017) 31—39.

M.Bester-Rogac, R. Neueder, J. Barthel, A.Apelblat, J. Solution Chem.26 (1997) 537—550.

R.A. Jothi, S. Vetrivel, S. Gopinath, R.U. Mullai, E. Vinoth, Appl. Phys. A: Mater. Sci. Process.127 (2021) 1—8.

G. Thangamani, M. Thangaraj, K. Moiduddin, S.H. Mian, H. Alkhalefah, U. Umer, Metals 11 (2021) 247.

DS. Patel, V. Sharma, V.K. Jain, J. Ramkumar, J. Electrochem. Soc.168 (2021) 043504.

G. Kumarasamy, P. Lakshmanan,G. Thangamani,Arabian J. Sci. Eng. 46 (2021) 2243—2259.

S. Zhan, Y. Zhao, J. Mater. Process. Technol. 291 (2021) 117049.

M. Soundarrajan, R. Thanigaivelan, Russ. J. Electrochem. 57 (2021) 172—182.

B. Mouliprasanth, P. Hariharan, Russ. J. Electrochem.57 (2021) 197—213.

V. Subburam, S. Ramesh, LI. Freitas, in Futuristic Trends in Intelligent Manufacturing: Optimization and Intelligence in Manufacturing, K. Palani Kumar, E. Natarajan, R. Sengottuvelu, J.P. Davim, Springer, (2021), p.33—46.

M. Soundarrajan, R. Thanigaivelan, S. Maniraj, in Advances in Industrial Automation and Smart Manufacturing, A. Arockiarajan, M. Duraiselvam, R. Raju (eds), Springer, (2021), p. 367—376.

C. Guo, B. Wu, B. Xu, S. Wu, J. Shen, X. Wu, J. Electrochem. Soc.168 (2021) 071502.

S. Ao, K. Li, W. Liu, X. Qin, T. Wang, Y. Dai, Z. Luo, J. Manuf.Process. 53 (2020) 223—228.

J.R. Vinod Kumaar, R. Thanigaivelan, Mater. Manuf. Processes.35 (2020) 969—977.

M. Soundarrajan, R. Thanigaivelan, Russ. J. Appl. Chem. 91 (2018) 1805—1813.

X.Chen, N. Qu, Z. Hou, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 88 (2017) 565—574.

E. Rajkeerthi, P. Hariharan, N. Pradeep, Mater. Manuf. Process. 36 (2021) 488—500.

J.R. Vinod Kumaar, R. Thanigaivelan, V. Dharmalingam, in Advances in Micro and Nano Manufacturing and Surface Engineering, M. Shunmugam, M. Kanthababu (eds),

Springer, (2019), p. 93—103.

K. Wang, Y. Wang, Q. Shen, Int. J. Electrochem. Sci. 15 (2020) 5430—5439.

S. Kunar, S. Mahata, B. Bhattacharyya, J. Micromanuf. 1 (2018) 124—133.

S.S. Anasane, B. Bhattacharyya, Advanced Manufacturing–I, in Proceeding of the AIMTDR 2014, IIT Guwahati, India (2014) p. 1—6.

B. Amipara, A.D. Galgale, N.G. Shah, Asian J. Water, Environ. Pollut. 18 (2021) 59—65.

A.F. Alkaim, T.A. Kandiel, R. Dillert, D.W. Bahnemann, Environ. Technol. 37 (2016) 2687—2693.

C.W. Cho, T.P.T. Pham, Y. Zhao, S. Stolte, Y.S. Yun, Sci. Total Environ.786 (2021) 147309.

Q.Y. Chen, J.S. Liu, Y. Liu, Y.H. Wang, J. Power Sources 238 (2013) 345—349.

J. Navisa, T. Sravya, M. Swetha, M. Venkatesan,Asian J. Sci. Res.7 (2014) 482—487.

K. Tangphant, K. Sudaprasert, S. Channarong, Russ. J. Electrochem. 50 (2014) 253—259.

D.Deconinck, S. Van Damme, J. Deconinck, Electrochim. Acta 69 (2012) 120—127.

B.M. Kolakowski, Z. Mester, Analyst 132 (2007) 842—864.

Downloads

Published

23.05.2022 — Updated on 15.08.2022

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

EFFECT OF DIFFERENT ELECTROLYTES ON ELECTROCHEMICAL MICRO-MACHINING OF SS 316L: Scientific paper. (2022). Chemical Industry & Chemical Engineering Quarterly, 28(4), 329-337. https://doi.org/10.2298/CICEQ211204007V

Similar Articles

1-10 of 68

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Most read articles by the same author(s)